|
ALTERNATIVE HEALTH STORE INTERNATIONAL |
|
|
|
Click Here for UK supplier of cheap Colloidal Silver (Reiki energised) or Food Grade Hydrogen Peroxide
Click Here for UK supplier ofhealthy Orgone Energy devices, etc
Barack Obama: The Naked Emperor
By David Icke
WWW.DAVIDICKE.COM/OBAMA (OriginalArticle)
I am writingthis in the last days of 2008 as I watch with dismay as vast numbers of peopleacross the world, including many who should know better, have been duped by themind-game called Operation Obama.
Even peoplewith some understanding of the conspiracy have said things like: 'Well, atleast he's not Bush' and 'Well, at least it's great to see such a new spirit ofhope'. No, he's not Bush - he's potentially far more dangerous; and what is theuse of a spirit of 'hope' if it's based on a lie? In fact, what use is 'hope'at all?
Obama'swife, Michelle, who I wouldn't trust to tell me the date in a calendar factory,said that 'everything begins and ends with hope'. Utter nonsense. Hope is ameaningless emotion because its fruits are always in the future and, by definition,never in the NOW.
Hope is likeriding a carousel horse; no matter how fast you go you never get closer to theone in front. The idea, however, is to persuade you to stay on the horse,despite the evitable disappointment, in the 'hope' that things will change. Butthey don't because the very system is designed to prevent it.
That's theway 'hope' is employed by the dastardly and devious - take the crap we aregiving you now in the 'hope' that things will get better (but we know theywon't). Barack Obama is a purveyor of 'hope' because his masters want thepeople to accept what they are given now in the hope that good times will come.
Just do whatwe demand, oops, sorry, Barack demands, and in return he'll inspire you to hopethat it is all leading to the Promised Land. It isn't, but, by the time yourealise that, it's too late.
Whatterrifies the manipulators is that people will abandon hope, as a future,sometime-never projection, and start to demand fairness, justice and freedomnow. To avoid this nightmare they need to keep those desires as something toaspire to, not to actually have.
Thus, theirman, Obama, sells 'hope' as a diversion technique, a holding position, to keepthe masses from truly rebelling. We have no job, no food on the table and ourhome has been foreclosed, but at least we have 'hope'. Phew, thank goodness forthat.
'I'm hungry,mum, can I have some hope, please?'
'I'm sosorry, darling, you can't have hope today, only tomorrow - hope is alwaystomorrow.'
'So will Ieat tomorrow, mum?'
'We can hopeso now, dear, but when we get to tomorrow, we can only hope it's the next day.'
On and on itgoes. That's how 'hope' works. Or rather doesn't.
Obama'spredominant mantra has been 'change'. Indeed, his massively-funded, record-breakingcampaign was based on that one word - change. This is a technique used by BillClinton and many others and it is highly effective because, at any point, thesystem ensures that most people are not happy with the way life is. So, whenyou don't like the status quo, 'change' can be a potent message, even if, likeObama, you don't say what it means.
It has beenvital to his success, and that of his controllers, that he has never specifiedwhat his 'hope', 'change', and that other mind-control trigger-word, 'believe',were referring to in terms of policy and the way society in general will beaffected. Hope for what? Change what? Believe in what? To answer thosequestions with specifics would have been fatal to Obama's appeal.
I studiedthe military/government mind-control programmes and techniques in great detailfor many years during the late-1990s and across 2000, and the Obama'phenomenon' is the most blatant mass-mind control operation you could wish tosee.
At its corethe plan has been to make Obama the focus of everything you hope for, believein and want to change. This is why it has been crucial for him not to specifyand detail what is meant by his 'hope, 'change' and 'believe'.
However, Ican tell you what those words mean in the context of the Obama mind-game. Theymean whatever you decide they mean or want them to mean. The idea is for you toproject all that you stand for onto him and so he becomes the symbol of you andhow you see the world. Specifics would destroy that 'I am whatever you want meto be' scenario and so you don't get any detail, just 'hope', 'change', and'believe'.
They don'twant him to be seen only as 'the Messiah'; they also want him to be AbrahamLincoln, JFK, or Buddha - anyone you choose to project on him, for he is ablank page, blank screen and empty suit. Obama is a make-your-own,do-it-yourself leader, a projection of your own mind. (If you are still asleep,that is. If you are in any way awake, he's an open book.)
'I amwhatever you want me to be, for I am just a projection of you. And I got a bigsmile, see.'
There is nomore powerful way of manipulating people than to tell them what they want tohear and to keep shtum about anything they wouldn't like. Double-glazingsalesmen are trained to pick up in general conversation what their target likesand dislikes and to respond accordingly in the way the product is sold. Thetechnique is simply to tell the potential buyer what you have gleaned they wantto be told.
Obama comesfrom the same stable, but on a massively bigger scale and with a whole networkof advisors and controllers steeped in the art of manipulating minds, opinionsand actions.
Obama'swritten-for-him speeches are not from the heart, but from the autocue. The'heart' bit comes from extensive training and his Bill Clintonesque ability to'mean it when he says it', a state of delivery that goes beyond mere acting.Tony Blair was trained in the same way.
But if youtake a step back and look at these people dispassionately you can clearly seethe techniques they consciously employ. Blair is the most blatant fraud in theway he delivers a line, stops in mid-sentence for emphasis and looks down forfake emotional effect. Obama is a little more slick, but, from where I havebeen looking this past year, not much. And how have people not seen those coldeyes just above the painted smile?
You canwatch his mind working, turning between autocue screens to his left and right,then straight down the camera for his key messages. From-the-heart orators don'tdo that; they are too immersed in what they are feeling and saying to give evena passing thought to where they are looking or how the line is delivered.
I worked intelevision for more than a decade, often reading autocue while a director spokein my ear telling me what cameras to look at. I have, since the early 1990s,spoken my truth on public stages across the world. I know, therefore, thedifference between artificial autocue delivery and body language and talkingfrom the heart without a script. Obama, I repeat, is coming from the autocue,not the heart.
Obama'sspeeches are a mass of mind-control techniques andNeuro-Linguistic-Programming, or NLP, and they are carefully constructed to implantbeliefs and perceptions into the mind of the viewer.
As I keepemphasising, the whole Obama circus is an exercise in mass mind control and ithas been so successful because so many people live their lives in a permanentstate of trance. All of which brings me to the parallels with Nazi Germany,fascist Italy and similar regimes throughout history.
Obama maynot look like Hitler, nor sound like Hitler, but the themes are just the same. Germany was in a terrible state economically and militarily in the 1930s in the aftermath of theFirst World War and the reparations inflicted on the country by theRothschild/Illuminati-controlled Versailles 'Peace' Conference in 1919.
From amidthe chaos came the man that Germans saw then in much the same way that so manysee Obama today. His name was Adolf Hitler and his oratory and rhetoric, againsupported by a ritualistic presentation founded on mind-control techniques,made him appear to be the German 'messiah', the German Obama.
Hitlerpromised 'change', 'hope' and something to 'believe in' amidst the consequencesof war and financial collapse. He spoke to vast rallies of adoring followersand a mass movement emerged in support of Hitler's vision of a new tomorrow.
As thewriter Webster Tarpley points out, fascism in its true sense is not just aPolice State imposed by a tiny hierarchy. It might end up like that, but firstit is brought to power by a mass movement from within the people who have nounderstanding of what the 'change', hope' and 'believe' they are being offeredreally means. They just know that they want some because, as with Obama, theymake it mean what they want it to mean. Only later do they see, to theirhorror, what they have signed up for.
Obama's America ...
... Hitler'sGermany.
There mayseem to be a world of difference, but the techniques are just the same.
Obama is farmore dangerous than Bush because he can sell a line to those who are in thetrance while Boy Bush could not do that on anything like the same scale. Bushwas a transparent idiot with no communication skills who needed massive fraudat the polls to get him officially 'elected'. He could never be the figureheadto inspire a mass movement of the people to support some vacuous 'hope','change' and 'believe' when they don't even know what those words are supposedto mean.
But Obamaclearly can, because he has.
One of 'his'(his controllers') prime targets are the young, just as they were with theNazis and the Hitler Youth Movement
In line withthis theme, the WorldNetDaily website reported:
'Theofficial website of President-Elect Barack Obama, Change.gov, originallyannounced that Obama would "require" all middle school throughcollege students to participate in community service programs; but after aflurry of blogs protested children being drafted into Obama's proposed youthcorps, the website's wording was softened.
Originally,under the tab "America Serves", Change.gov read,"President-Elect Obama will expand national service programs likeAmeriCorps and Peace Corps and will create a new Classroom Corps to helpteachers in under served schools, as well as a new Health Corps, Clean EnergyCorps, and Veterans Corps.
"Obamawill call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by developing a plan to require50 hours of community service in middle school and high school and 100 hours ofcommunity service in college every year," the site announced.'
Obama saidin a speech in July 2008 in Colorado Springs that he wanted to see a 'civiliannational security force' that would be as powerful and well-funded as theMarines, Navy and Air Force. As Joseph Farah, founder of WorldNetDaily, wrote:
'If we'regoing to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and wellfunded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn't this rather a big deal? Ithought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military.
How is itpossible their candidate is seeking to create some kind of massive but secretnational police force that will be even bigger than the Army, Navy, Marines andAir Force put together? Is Obama serious about creating some kind of domesticsecurity force bigger and more expensive than that? If not, why did he say it?What did he mean?'
Obama meant,amid the flowery words, that he's not in favour of either peace or freedom. Heis a front-man demagogue for the same force that controlled Boy Bush, Clinton,Father Bush, Reagan, Carter, ad infinitum; but the difference is that he hasbeen hyped to such hysterical proportions that he will be allowed to get awaywith far more than they were, at least until reality dawns on the mass ranks ofhis hypnotised supporters. And, clearly, that could take some time.
The cabalwill be anxious to squeeze every minute from Obama's honeymoon period and wecan expect to see events move quickly after his inauguration in January.
When I was ajournalist 30 years ago, I came across a technique that some tabloid newspaperreporters would use to get someone to speak with them. They would work in pairswith the first one knocking on the door of some distressed family who didn'twant to talk with the media. He would tell them he was from a newspaper hedidn't really work for and treat them with aggression and contempt to make themeven more upset.
He wouldthen leave and his colleague would knock on the door, tell them the realnewspaper he was from, and act like Mr. Nice Guy. He would say that heunderstood completely how upsetting the other man must have been, but 'if youwill only speak to me exclusively I will make sure that the other man, noranyone like him, won't bother you again'. They usually agreed and the scam wascomplete.
Much thesame thing is happening with regard to Bush and Obama. The Neoconservative'Republican' wing of the Illuminati controlled Bush for eight years and led thecountry into foreign wars and financial chaos (bad guy/problem); now the'Democratic' wing, led by the infamous Zbigniew Brzezinski, has brought forththe 'saviour', Barack Obama, to lead us into the sunshine with 'hope' and'change' (good guy/solution).
Hence evensome more aware people say: 'At least he's not Bush'.
Apart fromthe unspecified 'hope, 'change' and 'believe', few have any idea what Obama'spolicies will be. Public perception comes from having an 'image' of him, or aself-projection, not the fine print because Obama doesn't do fine print untilthe votes are cast and even then he will hide it in his windbag words.
There is an'image' that Obama is against war, but no he's not. He says he's against theinvasion of Iraq, though we'll see what he does about that in office. How can aman calling for more troops, including European troops, to be sent to Afghanistan be against war? He has also said he is prepared to bomb Pakistan and usemilitary force to stop Iran building nuclear weapons and he has appointedHillary 'Let's bomb 'em' Clinton (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission,Council on Foreign Relations) as Secretary of State and re-appointed Bush's'Let's bomb 'em' Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates (Bilderberg Group, Councilon Foreign Relations). So that's the 'change we can believe in', then.
Obama isn'tagainst war at all and, if his controllers have their way, he will engage the US in even more foreign conflicts with the troops sent to their deaths, and the deaths oftheir targets, on a wave of oratory from the dark suit with the black face whowould never go where he's sending them.
He claims tobe a 'uniter', which is exactly what Bush said about himself before he came tooffice, but unity in and of itself is not the issue. Nazi Germany had unity inthe early years of the war, but was that a good thing? What matters is what theunity is designed to achieve and Obama's much-vaunted 'unity' is to 'inspire' amass movement to support the Orwellian plans of the Illuminati.
His constantrhetoric about 'bringing people together' can be used to justify the 'comingtogether' of the United States, Canada and Mexico in the North American Union; itcan be used to concede America's sovereignty to the 'coming together' of the'world community' (world dictatorship); it can be used to unite the believersin their opposition and condemnation of non-believers, which is precisely whathappened in Nazi Germany with the book-burning and violent suppression of thosewho challenged the Hitler regime.
Thepotential of Obama Mania is endless when it comes to selling fascism as 'hope,change', 'freedom' and a 'New America', or 'New World' [Order].
Bush and Cheneywere transparent warmongers and would always have struggled to bring in thedraft, the compulsory enlistment of people into the military against theirwill. But it would not be as difficult for Obama in the current climate. Forgoodness sake, he's already talking about compulsory community service formiddle school, high school and college students and creating a peoples' army in America.
That's why Isay Obama is far more dangerous to freedom than Bush. In the last eight yearsBush could only get part of the way to fascism - Obama has the potential tofinish the job, for all the reasons I have mentioned and more.
You onlyhave to look at the cabal behind Obama, and those he has already appointed tohis administration team, to see what his 'change' is truly planned to be. Hismentor, svengali and main controller is Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter'sNational Security Advisor, and the co-founder, with David Rockefeller, of theIlluminati's Trilateral Commission.
Brzezinskihas admitted publicly that he began to fund and train what he would call today'terrorists' in Afghanistan to oppose the Soviet-controlled government in thecapital, Kabul, in the late 1970s. The idea, he said, was to entice the SovietUnion to invade Afghanistan to protect the Kabul regime and thus give the rivalsuperpower 'their Vietnam'. The plan worked at the cost of a million Afghanlives during the Soviet occupation from 1979 to 1989, a consequence thattroubles Brzezinski not at all.
Brzezinski's'freedom fighters' would become known as the 'Mujahideen' and later the Talibanand what is claimed to be 'Al-Qaeda'. This is the man behind 'anti-war', BarackObama. It was common knowledge that President Carter would do nothing involvingforeign policy without the okay from Brzezinski, the co-founder of theTrilateral Commission which chose Carter for president.
It is one ofmany great ironies of the Obama presidency that he is demanding massive troopreinforcements to be sent to Afghanistan to fight the Taliban terrorists whowere initially armed, trained and organised by Brzezinski, the man behindObama. As Morpheus says in The Matrix: 'Fate, it seems, is not without itssense of irony'.
But then, inBrzezinski's case, it is not 'fate', but cold calculation that has brought itall about. The Poland-born Brzezinski has a fierce hatred of Russia and that is still one of his key targets, together with China.
And if theyare Brzezinski's targets, they are Obama's targets.
TheTrilateral Commission and the wider Brzezinski network, including Illuminatifronts like the Ford Foundation, have now chosen Obama and the situation willbe the same. Brzezinski will call the shots; Obama's job is simply to sell themto the people. This is rather alarming when you think that Brzezinski wants totrigger a war involving Russia and China. 'Obama's' policies come straightfrom Brzezinski's books. Here is one Brzezinski quote you might recognise andit was made before Obama ran for president:
'Neededsocial reassessment ... can be encouraged by deliberate civic education thatstresses the notion of service to a higher cause than oneself. As some haveoccasionally urged, a major step in that direction would be the adoption of anobligatory period of national service for every young adult, perhaps involvinga variety of congressionally approved domestic or foreign good works.'
Now wherehave I heard that before?
As anIlluminati operative, Brzezinski's aim is to create a world government, centralbank, currency and army - a global dictatorship - underpinned by a microchippedpopulation connected to a global computer/satellite system. He wrote a book in1970, Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era, in which hedescribed the global society that he and the Illuminati seek to impose:
'Thetechnetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society.Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditionalvalues. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance overevery citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the mostpersonal information about the citizen. These files will be subject toinstantaneous retrieval by the authorities.'
He also saidin the same book nearly 40 years ago:
'Today we areagain witnessing the emergence of transnational elites ... [Whose] ties cutacross national boundaries ... It is likely that before long the social elitesof most of the more advanced countries will be highly internationalist orglobalist in spirit and outlook ... The nation-state is gradually yielding itssovereignty ... Further progress will require greater American sacrifices. Moreintensive efforts to shape a new world monetary structure will have to beundertaken, with some consequent risk to the present relatively favorableAmerican position.'
And whatdoes his puppet, Obama, now say that Americans have to do to bring about'change'? 'Make sacrifices'. As Mrs. Demagogue, Michelle, said:
'We need adifferent leadership because our souls are broken. We need to be inspired ...to make the sacrifices that are needed to push us to a different place.'
You can betthat this will include sacrificing more sovereignty and freedom on the road tothe global dictatorship described by Brzezinski for decades.
Brzezinski'sson, Mark, was an 'advisor' to the Obama campaign (doing what his father toldhim) and, in line with the American one-party-state, his other son, Ian, wasforeign policy advisor to the McCain campaign (doing what his father told him).His daughter, the Obama-supporting Mika Brzezinski, reported the campaign forMSNBC television.
Obama hasbeen the chosen one for a long time, a fact known only to a few in the deepinner circle, and his relationship with Brzezinski almost certainly goes backto the start of the 1980s when he attended the Ivy League, and big-timeIlluminati, Columbia University where Brzezinski was head of the Institute forCommunist Affairs. Obama simply will not talk in any detail about this period.He has been covertly funded and supported ever since by the TrilateralCommission and its network of foundations connecting into the Ford Foundation,for whom Obama's mother worked.
And aquestion: Does anyone really believe that someone, a 'man of the people', wouldsimply appear from apparently nowhere to run the slickest and best-fundedpresidential campaign in American history? He was chosen long ago by those whowish to enslave the very people that Obama says he wants to 'set free'.
The sourcesof Obama funding read like a Wall Street Who's Who - Goldman Sachs, UBS,Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, J.P. Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, andso on. No wonder he went back on his pledge to accept the limitations of publicfunding for his campaign and instead took the no-limit option of 'private'funding.
And thosepeople are going to support a candidate who does not represent their bestinterests?? Oh please.
Obama andhis seasoned network of professional manipulators, sorry his 'campaign team',sold the lie that he had refused to take funding from 'lobbyists', those whoare paid to ensure that politicians frame legislation, or block it, in theinterests of their clients.
But likeeverything that surrounds Obama, past and present, it's a sleight of hand andmouth. They funnelled vast sums of money into the Obama accounts through lawfirms that represent lobbyists and lobby groups. It provided 'plausible denial'about funding from lobbyists while the money poured in from lobby interests viathird parties.
Then thereis the Jewish financier, George Soros, the multi-billionaire associate ofBrzezinski and closely involved with the funding and marketing of Obama. Sorosis a former board member of the Illuminati's Council on Foreign Relations andfunds the European Council on Foreign Relations. In short, he is a majorinsider.
You cancertainly see the Soros/Brzezinski techniques in the Obama 'revolution' in the United States. It was the complex and secretive network of Soros foundations andorganisations, connected to the intelligence agencies of the US and Israel, that trained and funded students in the Ukraine, Georgia and elsewhere in the art ofmass protest and overthrowing governments.
Thesemanufactured protests were sold to the world as 'peoples' revolutions', but it justso happened that when they were over and the old regime was removed the newleaders were those waiting in the wings all along - the puppets of Soros,Brzezinski and their associated networks.
Obama isjust more of the same, a big smile with strings attached, and controlledcompletely by the Illuminati networks that chose him, trained him, sold him andprovided his record funding. It was they who kept his many skeletons underwraps, like the gay sex and crack cocaine allegations of Larry Sinclair, and theywill continue to do so as long as he jumps to their bidding.
Obama isjust another Banksters' moll prostituting himself for fame and power, andthat's why he supported the grotesque bail-out of the banking system and why hewill always put their interests before the people. His financial advisors arestraight from the Wall Street 'A' list, including Paul Adolph Volker(Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group), thehead of the Federal Reserve from 1979 to 1987 and Illuminati to his fingertips.
Obama hasmade him head of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board, which is dominated byinsiders, including its staff director and chief economist, Austan Goolsbee, aclose Obama associate from the University of Chicago. Goolsbee is an initiateof the infamous Illuminati Skull and Bones Society at Yale University, which also includes Boy and Father Bush. It was Goolsbee who told the Canadiangovernment not to worry about Obama's attacks on the economic effects of 'freetrade' agreements because his words were just to win votes in the electioncampaign.
Another WallStreet insider, the Zionist Timothy Geithner (Bilderberg Group, TrilateralCommission, Council on Foreign Relations), was appointed by Obama to be hisTreasury Secretary. Geithner was the President of the New York Federal ReserveBank, the most powerful in the private 'Federal' Reserve cartel thatmasquerades as America's 'central bank', and he is a former employee of boththe Council on Foreign Relations and the appalling Kissinger Associates.
Obama'sTreasury team locks into the inner circle around the Zionist Robert Rubin, theDirector and Senior Counselor of Citigroup, co-chairman of the Council onForeign Relations, and economic advisor to Obama. Rubin, a member of the IlluminatiBilderberg Group, was the man behind Citigroup's strategy of expanding its riskin debt markets which forced it to be rescued by taxpayers' money.
The verypeople who caused the financial crisis are being appointed by Obama to decidehow to respond to it (more taxpayers' money for them and their friends).
Rubin wasTreasury Secretary to Bill Clinton and was followed in that post by LarrySummers (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations)- another insider appointed to Obama's team of 'change'. Summers is a fanaticalsupporter of 'free trade' (freedom to exploit) and 'globalisation' (globaldictatorship) and he wrote a memo in 1991, while chief economist to the WorldBank, saying that the bank should dump toxic waste in poor countries becausethe costs of the ensuing ill-health and death would be lower. When the memo wasmade public, Brazil's then-Secretary of the Environment, Jose Lutzenburger,told Summers:
'Yourreasoning is perfectly logical but totally insane ... Your thoughts [provide] aconcrete example of the unbelievable alienation, reductionist thinking, socialruthlessness and the arrogant ignorance of many conventional 'economists'concerning the nature of the world we live in ... If the World Bank keeps youas vice president it will lose all credibility. To me it would confirm what Ioften said ...the best thing that could happen would be for the Bank todisappear.'
Lutzenburgerwas dismissed shortly after writing this letter while the horrific Summers wasmade US Treasury Secretary by Bill Clinton and now he has been appointed tohead the National Economic Council by Mr. 'change', hope' and 'believe' Obama.It's all a fairy story.
Bloomberg.comreported that the Center for American Progress (CAP), housed just three blocksfrom the White House, has become a major source for policy initiatives for theObama Democratic Party. Who funds the Center for American Progress? GeorgeSoros.
It is simplythe Neocon Project for the New American Century and the American EnterpriseInstitute under another name. Those two organisations developed and dictatedthe Bush policy of war and suppression of freedom and the 'CAP' and others likeit will do the same for Obama. The CAP will fit and Obama will wear it.
In fact,except in name and rhetoric, there is no difference in theme between theregimes of Bush and Obama. Bush policy was dictated through Illuminati 'thinktanks' and so is Obama's.
Bush wassurrounded by slavish pursuers of Israeli interests and so is Obama. Mr. 'Change'has pledged his unquestioning support for Israel to the point of 'pass the sickbag' and his vice-president, Joe Biden (Bilderberg Group, Council on ForeignRelations), is a vehement Zionist who makes a virtue of saying he will support Israel in all circumstances.
Obama hasappointed the arch Zionist Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff and another superZionist Jew, Dennis Ross, to be his Middle East Policy advisor. God help thePalestinians. Ross also served in the Bill Clinton and Father George Bushadministrations. Oh, plenty of 'change' there, then.
RahmEmanuel, a Chicago-born Congressman, is the son of Benjamin M. Emanuel, who wasa member of the murderous Jewish terrorist organisation, Irgun, which helped tobomb and terrorise Israel into existence. The Open Secrets website reports thatEmanuel was the top House recipient in 2008 for election contributions from'hedge funds, private equity firms and the larger securities/investmentindustry'.
Emanuel wasalso appointed by Bill Clinton to the board of the mortgage giant Freddie Macin 2000 and his tenure coincided with a stream of scandals and financialirregularities. It famously had to be bailed out by the taxpayer amid thesub-prime mortgage debacle.
Emanuel,like Obama himself, is an asset of the 'Illinois Combine', a cross-partynetwork of politicians and business interests that conspires to manipulate Chicago politics for their own benefit. Even before taking over at the White House Emanuelfaced calls for his resignation for alleged connections with the RodBlagojevich scandal.
In December2008 Blagojevich, the Illinois governor and associate of Obama, was arrestedover a conspiracy involving massive corruption and moves to sell Obama's Senateseat in Chicago made vacant by his election to the presidency. It is yetanother example of the staggering web on ongoing and infamous corruption in Chicago by the very networks that spawned Obama.
A closefriend of Rahm Emanuel is another clone of the Illinois Combine, the Zionist,David Axelrod, who ran Obama's election campaign and will no doubt be highlyinfluential in the Obama administration. Axelrod is a veteran of Chicago politics, one of the most corrupt political systems in the world and he worked formany Chicago mayors in the 1990s and on Obama's senate campaign in 2004.
Bill Clintontook his Arkansas cabal to Washington when he became president in 1993 andObama is uploading his Chicago mob and handing them key positions of nationalpower and influence. And these guys don't take prisoners.
All of thismay be many things, none of them pleasant, but 'change' it isn't.
DavidAxelrod, Obama's 'narrator' and handler.
Obama is amonumental fraud who talks a good story, but lives a very different one. He wonhis first political office as a state senator in Chicago in 1996, not throughthe power of his policies, but by coldly abusing the electoral process.
Instead ofrunning against his opponents and letting the people decide, he had his cronieschallenge hundreds of names on the nomination papers of his Democratic primaryrivals until they were all forced off the ballot by technicalities. He then ranunopposed. One of them, Gha-is Askia, says that Obama's behaviour belied hisimage as a champion of the little guy and crusader for voter rights:
'Why sayyou're for a new tomorrow, then do old-style Chicago politics to removelegitimate candidates? He talks about honour and democracy, but what honour isthere in getting rid of every other candidate so you can run scot-free? Why notlet the people decide?'
Why? Becausehe would probably have lost and Obama isn't interested in losing by playingfair. He wants to win by any means necessary. The only voter-right he'sinterested in is the right to vote for him. He has also used his hatchet-menlike Axelrod to employ scandal to discredit opponents to ensure his electionwhen the real scandal is the truth about Obama himself.
He is aclassically corrupt main-chancer spawned from the Chicago political cesspit.His close connections, therefore, to seriously dodgy 'businessmen' andfraudsters like the now-jailed slum landlord Tony Rezko are exactly what youwould expect.
Rezko, yetanother snout in the trough of the Illinois Combine, has heavily funded Obama'spolitical career and that of the now-arrested Rod Blagojevich, and in returnthey have supported massive sums being paid to Rezko by Chicago taxpayers torun 'public housing'.
Theseproperties were then allowed to fall into such a state of danger and disrepair,including sewage running into kitchen sinks, that they were deemed unfit forhabitation by the often black poor that Obama was supposed to be representingas a Senator. Some buildings were so bad they had to be demolished.
Rezko alsosecured appointments for his business associates to state boards and waseventually indicted for using these connections to demand kickbacks frombusinesses that wanted to do business with the state.
Rezko andObama toured the $1.6 million mansion in Hyde Park, Chicago, which the Obamasbought at $300,000 below the asking price in 2005 while the Rezkos purchasedthe adjoining land at the full asking price. Some of this land was later boughtby the Obamas. Rezko contributed a quarter of a million dollars to Obama'spolitical career and served on Obama's Senate campaign finance committee, whichraised more than $14 million.
Then thereis Obama's close association with the terrorists, William Ayers and his wifeBernardine Dohrn. In the late sixties Ayers co-founded the terror organisationcalled the Weather Underground (also known as the Weathermen and similarderivatives) and launched a campaign of bombing public places like the Pentagonand the Capitol Building. Three members were killed making bombs in Greenwich Village.
In 1970Ayers was said to have described their philosophy as: 'Kill all the richpeople. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, killyour parents, that's where it's really at ...' Mr. Ayers himself comes from thehome of 'rich people'.
BernardineDohrn said this about the Charles Manson murders: 'Dig it! Manson killed thosepigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them, then they shoved a forkinto a victim's stomach.''
The caseagainst Ayers and Dohrn was thrown out because of then illegal wire-taps andAyers is now a professor in the College of Education at the University of Illinois at Chicago, holding the titles of Distinguished Professor of Educationand Senior University Scholar.
Ayersrecruited Obama to serve as chairman on the $100 million Chicago AnnenbergChallenge and they worked together for seven years handing out grants to the'educational' projects of people like ... William Ayers. They also workedtogether on another tax-exempt foundation, the Woods Fund in Chicago, whichawarded grants to Obama's own Trinity United Church, home to his controversialpastor, Jeremiah Wright.
Obama'spolitical career was effectively launched in 1995, just after he was madechairman of the Annenberg Challenge, at a meeting at the Chicago home of ...William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. They have been connected to his circle eversince if the truth be told.
The ChicagoAnnenberg Challenge, run by Obama and Ayers, didn't fund schools directly, butinstead insisted that they affiliate with 'external partners' who were grantedthe money. These turned out to be far-left 'community organisers' so beloved ofBill Ayers and these groups included the Association of Community Organizationsfor Reform Now (or Acorn).
Obama alsoconducted 'leadership training' seminars with Acorn and its members began tobecome heavily involved in his political campaigns. It has also been behindefforts to 'register voters' (voters most likely to vote for Obama) and Nevadastate officials raided Acorn's Las Vegas office after election authoritiesaccused the group of submitting multiple voter registrations with fake andduplicate names.
Among themajor funders of Acorn ... George Soros.
Obama evenrefuses to prove that he was born in the United States and thus qualifies to bePresident. He claims to have been born in Hawaii, but his grandmother,half-brother and half-sister in Kenya all insist he was born there.
'Mr. Clean'Obama has a deeply dirty background, but for now no scale of evidence will stopthe swooning Obama zombies from believing the hype or burst their realitybubble. That is going to take hard experience and it could take some time and alot of disappointment before they are released from the clutches of cognitivedissonance and have to admit to themselves they have been had.
It is thesame for all the black people who voted for what they thought was the firstblack president when, in truth, he is a man in a black mask representing the interestsof the white-faced Illuminati cabal, the very families and networks that ranthe slave trade.
I don't wantto be the bringer of bad news or the thwarter of dreams, but honesty demandsit. The man is a trickster controlled by supertricksters. A sock puppetcontrolled by bigger sock puppets who serve an even greater and darker evil. Tohis masters, Obama is just a means to an end and if it suits them toassassinate him to trigger civil war and upheaval in the United States then that is what they will do.
Oh dearOprah, how will you cope when reality dawns? But, then, will it ever??
'What? Youmean you're not the Lord?'
I canunderstand the appeal of Obama because people want him to be what he claims tobe, but isn't. They are sick of the conflict, the corruption, the struggle wecall 'life' and they want it all to change. But Obama's change is illusory andrepresents only the continued transformation of society in the image envisagedby Orwell.
We will seesome apparently good things announced, like the closing of Guantanamo, to givethe impression that Obama means what he says. But keep your eye on the ball andyou'll see how the agenda of the global tyranny is introduced under the guiseof Obama's 'hope', 'change', 'believe', 'sacrifice' and 'coming together'.
It couldtake two years, maybe much more, before cognitive dissonance (lying toyourself) loses it current grip on the minds of the Obama faithful. Until thenthey will make endless excuses for him (lie to themselves) to keep the 'dream' alive.
But one daythey will have to admit, by the power of the evidence before them, that theybought a dream and got a nightmare. What a pity they can't see the obvious nowand save them themselves such painful disappointment.
|
|
|
|
ALTERNATIVE HEALTH STORE INTERNATIONAL |
Last updated 8 September 2010